Changes between Initial Version and Version 5 of Ticket #11376
- Timestamp:
- Dec 18, 2007, 6:35:59 PM (17 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #11376
-
Property
Priority
changed from
Expected
toNormal
- Property Owner changed from kvv@… to jmpp@…
-
Property
Version
changed from
1.4
to
-
Property
Priority
changed from
-
Ticket #11376 – Description
initial v5 3 3 1. Trac forgets my login when following most links. I'm not really sure what's going on here, because it doesn't always do this. For example, if I enter "http://www.macports.org/", then go there, it remembers earlier logins in the current browser sessin, and if there is no login session, the password memory makes logging in easy. Both facilities fail when I follow links into the tracker. Maybe it's that trac doesn't live at www.macports.org, but at trac.macports.org, and my browser doesn't send the cookie. 4 4 5 2. ''All'' trac pages should have a New Bug button.5 2. ~~''All'' trac pages should have a New Bug button.~~ 6 6 7 7 3. Many displays assume I have space for a 1200 pixel width window. (a) I don't on several of my workstations (subnotebooks), and (b) I am not a fan of letting any application take over my entire screen, especially not one subject to network delays. … … 11 11 5. There's no easy way to search for bugs against a single port. 12 12 13 6. The custom query as initialized looks for bugs assigned to me. Make that a standard query, for heaven's sake. The custom query is the only available workaround for #5, so you're encouraging users to enter duplicate bugs by making it annoying to search for existing bugs. The custom query should be initialized to search the summary.13 6. ~~The custom query as initialized looks for bugs assigned to me. Make that a standard query, for heaven's sake. The custom query is the only available workaround for #5, so you're encouraging users to enter duplicate bugs by making it annoying to search for existing bugs. The custom query should be initialized to search the summary.~~ 14 14 15 7. Ticket properties are insane. Yes, I've come to "expect" MacPorts to throw at least one reportable bug a week, not to mention frequent minor annoyances, but what does "Priority: expected" mean in terms of getting things ''fixed''?15 7. ~~Ticket properties are insane. Yes, I've come to "expect" MacPorts to throw at least one reportable bug a week, not to mention frequent minor annoyances, but what does "Priority: expected" mean in terms of getting things ''fixed''?~~ 16 16 17 Version: Most bugs have nothing to do with the version of "port", and everything to do with the portfile. Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be a way to express the fact that you're tracking base by subversion, which is where you'd expect the most "port" bugs to show up. 17 ~~Version: Most bugs have nothing to do with the version of "port", and everything to do with the portfile. Furthermore, there doesn't seem to be a way to express the fact that you're tracking base by subversion, which is where you'd expect the most "port" bugs to show up.~~ 18 18 19 Component: is trac "www" or "infrastructure"? Does "Uninstaller" really need its own component? 19 ~~Component: is trac "www" or "infrastructure"? Does "Uninstaller" really need its own component?~~ 20 20 21 Severity: hardly seems the right way to describe an enum of "Crash/data loss", "Serious", "Security", "Performance", "Other". 21 ~~Severity: hardly seems the right way to describe an enum of "Crash/data loss", "Serious", "Security", "Performance", "Other".~~ 22 22 23 Keywords: What keywords are acceptable? 23 ~~Keywords: What keywords are acceptable?~~ 24 24 25 25 8. Help isn't very visible. 26 26 27 9. Help doesn't describe this tracker in any detail.27 9. ~~Help doesn't describe this tracker in any detail.~~ 28 28 29 10. Help doesn't describe this tracker accurately (it implies that Priority/Severity should not be separate properties).29 10. ~~Help doesn't describe this tracker accurately (it implies that Priority/Severity should not be separate properties).~~