#45408 closed update (fixed)
autoconf-archive @2013.06.09: update to @2014.10.15
Reported by: | cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | autoconf-archive |
Description
Announcement email: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-archive-announce/2014-10/msg00001.html
Besides the new version number and checksums, the Portfile update should also deal with the following change:
The Archive no longer creates release tarballs compressed with gzip and bzip2; only tarballs compressed with xz and lzip are distributed.
(We will probably want to set use_xz yes
in the Portfile)
Also, livecheck confirms the update:
$ port -v livecheck autoconf-archive autoconf-archive seems to have been updated (port version: 2013.06.09, new version: 2014.10.15)
(autoconf-archive is nomaintainer btw)
Change History (7)
comment:1 follow-up: 3 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to ryandesign@… |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Version: | 2.3.1 |
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Replying to egall@…:
(We will probably want to set
use_xz yes
in the Portfile)We already did this last year in r109317.
Oh, I see that now... I swear I checked for that line before mentioning it, but I guess I must have just been looking too quickly and missed it...
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Actually wait a second... why was the conflict with gnome-common introduced?
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Because both ports try to install a file of the same name.
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Because both ports try to install a file of the same name.
Well yeah, that's why ports usually are marked as conflicting in general, but what was the specific file in this case? I suppose I can try to guess:
$ port contents gnome-common Port gnome-common contains: /opt/local/bin/gnome-autogen.sh /opt/local/bin/gnome-doc-common /opt/local/share/aclocal/ax_check_enable_debug.m4 /opt/local/share/aclocal/ax_code_coverage.m4 /opt/local/share/aclocal/gnome-code-coverage.m4 /opt/local/share/aclocal/gnome-common.m4 /opt/local/share/aclocal/gnome-compiler-flags.m4 /opt/local/share/gnome-common/data/omf.make /opt/local/share/gnome-common/data/xmldocs.make
I assume it was one of the macro files starting with the "ax_
" prefix? If that is the case, I would recommend removing gnome-common's copies of those macros and having it depend on autoconf-archive instead, as the "ax_
" macros are from the autoconf-archive in the first place.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Yup, I'll file a bug report for the gnome-common port.
Replying to egall@…:
We already did this last year in r109317.