17 | | Based on it, what would you recommend? |
| 17 | ~~Based on it, what would you recommend?~~ |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Following your instructions, I got the following: |
| 20 | {{{ |
| 21 | Error: Unrecognized action "port deendents" |
| 22 | $ sudo port dependents perl5.12 |
| 23 | perl5 depends on perl5.12 |
| 24 | $ sudo port install perl5 +perl5_16 |
| 25 | ---> Computing dependencies for perl5 |
| 26 | ---> Fetching archive for perl5 |
| 27 | ---> Attempting to fetch perl5-5.12.4_0+perl5_16.darwin_13.noarch.tbz2 from http://packages.macports.org/perl5 |
| 28 | ---> Attempting to fetch perl5-5.12.4_0+perl5_16.darwin_13.noarch.tbz2.rmd160 from http://packages.macports.org/perl5 |
| 29 | ---> Installing perl5 @5.12.4_0+perl5_16 |
| 30 | ---> Deactivating perl5 @5.12.4_0+perl5_12 |
| 31 | ---> Cleaning perl5 |
| 32 | ---> Activating perl5 @5.12.4_0+perl5_16 |
| 33 | ---> Cleaning perl5 |
| 34 | ---> Updating database of binaries |
| 35 | ---> Scanning binaries for linking errors |
| 36 | ---> No broken files found. |
| 37 | $ sudo port dependents perl5.12 |
| 38 | perl5 depends on perl5.12 |
| 39 | $ sudo port install pcsc-tools |
| 40 | ---> Computing dependencies for pcsc-tools |
| 41 | ---> Fetching archive for pcsc-tools |
| 42 | ---> Attempting to fetch pcsc-tools-1.4.22_0.darwin_13.x86_64.tbz2 from http://packages.macports.org/pcsc-tools |
| 43 | ---> Attempting to fetch pcsc-tools-1.4.22_0.darwin_13.x86_64.tbz2.rmd160 from http://packages.macports.org/pcsc-tools |
| 44 | ---> Installing pcsc-tools @1.4.22_0 |
| 45 | ---> Activating pcsc-tools @1.4.22_0 |
| 46 | ---> Cleaning pcsc-tools |
| 47 | ---> Updating database of binaries |
| 48 | ---> Scanning binaries for linking errors |
| 49 | ---> No broken files found. |
| 50 | }}} |
| 51 | |
| 52 | So while it appears that perl still somehow relies upon perl5.12, pcsc-tools not installed smoothly. |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Thanks! |
| 55 | |
| 56 | P.S. I'd be grateful if you could tell me whether it would be safe to get rid of perl5.12 (and if so - how), and whether it would make sense. Here's what makes me concerned: |
| 57 | {{{ |
| 58 | $ port dependents perl5.12 |
| 59 | perl5 depends on perl5.12 |
| 60 | $ port dependents perl5 |
| 61 | autoconf depends on perl5 |
| 62 | autoconf213 depends on perl5 |
| 63 | automake depends on perl5 |
| 64 | clang-3.5 depends on perl5 |
| 65 | ghostscript depends on perl5 |
| 66 | glib2 depends on perl5 |
| 67 | llvm-3.5 depends on perl5 |
| 68 | openldap depends on perl5 |
| 69 | ps2eps depends on perl5 |
| 70 | swig-perl depends on perl5 |
| 71 | texi2html depends on perl5 |
| 72 | }}} |