Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#51497 closed defect (fixed)
unittest-cpp @1.4.1 Upgrade to version 1.6.1
Reported by: | jmgc | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.4 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | unittest-cpp |
Description
Since the last Portfile update, the UnitTest-C++ project has changed its host and address, so the port does not work anymore. A new Portfile has been prepared using the version 1.6.1. It has been cleaned as the installation has been simplified. A patch has been created with the changes.
Attachments (1)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by jmgc
Sorry, where can I find the github portgroup documentation to use it properly? Thanks in advance
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
You have to look at the portgroup code or use another port as an example. Look at elixir
as an example.
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by jmgc
Sorry, but I am not able to request the file https://github.com/unittest-cpp/unittest-cpp/tarball/v1.6.1.tar.gz using the portgroup. I am quite sure that I am doing something wrong, but I do not know how to solve it. The present lines for github are:
PortGroup github 1.0
github.setup unittest-cpp unittest-cpp 1.6.1 v
comment:6 follow-up: 8 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
You removed the muniversal
portgroup. Does it build universal properly now in the new version?
comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to ryandesign |
---|---|
Status: | new → accepted |
Has duplicate #52926.
comment:8 Changed 8 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to mf2k:
You removed the
muniversal
portgroup. Does it build universal properly now in the new version?
Yes. The muniversal portgroup was used because the project did not use autoconf. The new version does use autoconf so muniversal is no longer needed.
comment:9 Changed 8 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | accepted → closed |
Thanks. Some comments:
revision
line should be deleted because it starts at 0 when increasing the version and that is the default value.md5
andsha1
checksums unless upstream provides them.