Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 8 years ago
#52196 closed defect
Consider not using @rpath for llvm and clang libraries — at Initial Version
| Reported by: | jeremyhu (Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia) | Owned by: | jeremyhu (Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.4 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | llvm-3.8 llvm-3.9 llvm-devel |
Description
We should consider not using @rpath for the newer llvm-3.8 and newer libraries. We probably will still want to keep libLTO as @rpath-relative such that ld64 will continue to use the version from the selected toolchain.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.