Opened 8 years ago
Last modified 6 months ago
#53948 new update
couchdb: update to 3.3.3
| Reported by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | Owned by: | ci42 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | security | Cc: | chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez) |
| Port: | couchdb |
Description
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
| Summary: | couchdb: Update to 2.0.0.1 → couchdb: Update to 2.1.0 |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
| Keywords: | security added |
|---|
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
| Summary: | couchdb: Update to 2.1.0 → couchdb: Update to 2.2.0 |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
Latest is 2.3.1 (released 2019-03-12).
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
| Cc: | chrstphrchvz added |
|---|
comment:6 follow-up: 7 Changed 5 years ago by zerok (Horst Gutmann)
Hi :)
I'd like to work on this. It seems like that building CouchDB 2.x from source requires an Erlang OTP <= 19 but the Erlang port is basically tracking upstream major releases. Should I use the binary distribution of CouchDB instead?
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
Replying to zerok:
I'd like to work on this. It seems like that building CouchDB 2.x from source requires an Erlang OTP <= 19 but the Erlang port is basically tracking upstream major releases. Should I use the binary distribution of CouchDB instead?
I don't know whether you should use the binary instead, but from building from source, the release notes for CouchDB 2.3.1 claim it to be compatible with Erlang 21.x, and MacPorts' erlang is currently 21.1.
comment:8 Changed 6 months ago by mohd-akram (Mohamed Akram)
| Summary: | couchdb: Update to 2.2.0 → couchdb: update to 3.3.3 |
|---|
CVE-2018-11769: Apache CouchDB Remote Code Execution (affects versions 1.x and ≤2.1.2)