Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #59832, comment 23


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 16, 2020, 4:16:56 PM (5 years ago)
Author:
noloader (Jeffrey Walton)
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #59832, comment 23

    initial v1  
    66> Presently we build libgcc7 using the default (new) ABI, but force all the builds to the old abi by building with an enabled macro {{{_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0}}}. That is most likely the issue here. See <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/using_dual_abi.html>.
    77
    8 Forgive me for the noise... If needed, here is the blog post covering `_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI` from Red Hat: [GCC 5 in Fedora](https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/02/10/gcc-5-in-fedora-2/). Also see [Dual ABI](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/using_dual_abi.html) in the GCC docs.
     8Forgive me for the noise... If needed, here is the blog post covering `_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI` from Red Hat: [https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2015/02/10/gcc-5-in-fedora-2/ GCC 5 in Fedora]. Also see [https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/using_dual_abi.html Dual ABI] in the GCC docs.
    99
    1010`-Wabi-tags` may be useful while experimenting with `_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI`.