Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Ticket #64142, comment 10


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 16, 2021, 3:12:03 AM (3 years ago)
Author:
RobK88
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #64142, comment 10

    v3 v4  
    11@Renee and Ryan -- I apologize for messing up my first Pull Request (PR).  I am new to a DISTRIBUTED CVS like GitHib. In fact when I started to program in the 70s on mainframes using punch cards, CVS type systems did not even exist.
    22
    3 What confused me in the Macports Guide were the terms git and Github. In my view, the documentation should make it clear that the term `git` DOES NOT include a repo on `github.com`. (I am sure that experienced developers who use `git` and `Github` would not confuse the two. But that is not the case for `git` newbies). And unfortunately, the capabilities of GitHub.com is more limited than a local git repo (as I just discovered).  e.g One cannot amend a commit on GitHub.com without amending the commit on a local git repo and pushing the changes to GitHub.com. 
     3What confused me in the Macports Guide were the terms git and Github. In my view, the documentation should make it clear that the term `git` DOES NOT include a repo on `github.com`. (I am sure that experienced developers who use `git` and `Github` would not confuse the two. But that is not the case for `git` newbies). And unfortunately, the capabilities of GitHub.com is more limited than a local git repo (as I just discovered).  e.g One cannot amend a commit on GitHub.com without amending the commit on a local git repo and pushing (or force pushing) the changes to GitHub.com. 
    44
    55For Macports Pull Requests, it looks like the following is the best workflow: