Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #68486, comment 4
- Timestamp:
- Oct 17, 2023, 4:56:47 AM (13 months ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #68486, comment 4
initial v1 12 12 Xcode and the CLT are not provided by MacPorts. You're expected to have installed one or the other or both prior to using MacPorts. 13 13 14 libfido2 does not require clang-15. You can confirm this by running `port deps libfido2`. If you believed it does because it says so on the ports.macports.org web site, the ports web site is in error because its data is generated on a non-macOS operating system where clang-15 is apparently a dependency of most or all ports. Or, if `port deps libfido2` does really show clang-15 on your system, that would bepresumably be evidence that MacPorts could not find a compiler from either Xcode or the CLT and tried to use a MacPorts version instead, but the intended way to use MacPorts on macOS is to have Xcode and/or the CLT installed so that that compiler can be used for most ports. (Some ports—not libfido2—do have more specific compiler requirements and might actually configure themselves to use specific versions of MacPorts clang.)14 libfido2 does not require clang-15. You can confirm this by running `port deps libfido2`. If you believed it does because it says so on the ports.macports.org web site, the ports web site is in error because its data is generated on a non-macOS operating system where clang-15 is apparently a dependency of most or all ports. Or, if `port deps libfido2` does really show clang-15 on your system, that would presumably be evidence that MacPorts could not find a compiler from either Xcode or the CLT and tried to use a MacPorts version instead, but the intended way to use MacPorts on macOS is to have Xcode and/or the CLT installed so that that compiler can be used for most ports. (Some ports—not libfido2—do have more specific compiler requirements and might actually configure themselves to use specific versions of MacPorts clang.) 15 15 16 16 Replying to [comment:3 jmroot]: