Changes between Version 78 and Version 79 of FAQ
- Timestamp:
- Jul 19, 2009, 9:46:24 AM (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
FAQ
v78 v79 215 215 == Portfile Development and Maintenance Questions == 216 216 217 === Is it possible to have a dependency on a specific variant of another port? E.g. "postgresql8 +server"? === # 126217 === Is it possible to have a dependency on a specific variant of another port? E.g. "postgresql8 +server"? === #dependonvariant 218 218 219 219 No. This is ticket #126. The dependency engine is currently unable to handle specifying anything beyond "port X requires port Y" or "port X requires file Z which can be provided by port Y." There have been discussions on revamping the engine (see the mailing list archives) but nothing concrete as yet. This is why the most useful variants really shouldn't be variants at all but rolled into the port itself. It can also sometimes be useful to break variants out into separate ports (e.g. the postgresql83-doc and postgresql83-server ports, instead of having +doc or +server variants of the postgresql83 port).