#1097 closed defect (fixed)
update: apache 2.0.48
Reported by: | jcorley1@… | Owned by: | fkr@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | darwinports-bugs@… | |
Port: |
Description
Update apache2 port to 2.0.48. Whoever decided to remove apache2.sh from files should probably also put that back with this change. Not having it kind of makes the activate_server variant not work.
Attachments (3)
Change History (10)
Changed 21 years ago by jcorley1@…
comment:1 Changed 21 years ago by jcorley1@…
Owner: | changed from darwinports-bugs@… to fkr@… |
---|
Changed 21 years ago by bchesneau@…
Attachment: | portfile.diff added |
---|
minor fix compared to previous patch
comment:2 Changed 21 years ago by fkr@…
attachments.isobsolete: | 0 → 1 |
---|
comment:3 Changed 21 years ago by fkr@…
Cc: | darwinports-bugs@… added |
---|
slight modification to diff. Jason, could you give a quick sign, of wether benoitc's work is ok with you. thanks.
felix
comment:4 Changed 21 years ago by jcorley1@…
Why exactly are you moving httpd.conf to httpd.conf.sample instead of copying? Is our goal to not deliver something that works? As far as the rest of it it seems fine, but I don't know what you mean by "benoitc's work."
comment:5 Changed 21 years ago by fkr@…
because otherwise we overwrite an already configured file in
${prefix}/apache2/conf during install-phase.
We decided on using .sample files, until we can properly handle
installing config-files.
With 'benoitc's work' I mean:
attachment:portfile.diff
-fkr
comment:6 Changed 21 years ago by jcorley1@…
Yes, the patch looks fine, though I haven't tested it yet. If you've built it and it works I'm fine with comitting it.
Portfile patch