Opened 16 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#17189 closed enhancement (fixed)
tcl 8.5.5 - Add variant for installing the private headers
| Reported by: | krunk7@… | Owned by: | MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez), cooljeanius (Eric Gallager), larryv (Lawrence Velázquez) | |
| Port: | tcl |
Description
This patch adds a variant to tcl 8.5.5. port which enables installation of the tcl private headers needed to build some applications.
Attachments (1)
Change History (16)
Changed 16 years ago by krunk7@…
| Attachment: | patch-tcl-Portfile.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to mww@… |
|---|---|
| Port: | tcl added |
Assigning to maintainer.
comment:2 follow-up: 4 Changed 16 years ago by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez)
Until dependencies allow inclusion of variants (#126), may I humbly suggest that, if the private headers are to be installed,
that it be the default behavior and not a variant.
Otherwise, no port could reliably ensure that they are installed.
Including the private headers would make, e.g., maintaining the port expect easier.
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez)
| Cc: | mcalhoun@… added |
|---|
Cc Me!
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by blb@…
Replying to mcalhoun@…:
Including the private headers would make, e.g., maintaining the port expect easier.
Would that fix #13827?
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by markd@…
Installing private headers breaks some things. Don't remember what, but if I had time to dredge up an old ticket from 3-4 years ago it would give details because at one time the private headers were installed by default briefly until the problems were noticed. I suppose if the variant were commented well it might be ok.
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez)
comment:7 follow-up: 11 Changed 16 years ago by malte.sussdorff@…
comment:8 Changed 16 years ago by (none)
| Milestone: | Port Enhancements |
|---|
Milestone Port Enhancements deleted
comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Replying to malte.sussdorff@…:
I do agree that private headers would make things much easier, if only that it would allow the port of xotcl to get to a new version and not having to linger with an outdated version for ages now.
That, and other outdated Tcl-related ports.
comment:13 Changed 8 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
comment:14 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Owner: | mww@… deleted |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
| Version: | 1.6.0 |
See #53012.
comment:15 Changed 6 years ago by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez (Marcus Calhoun-Lopez)
| Owner: | set to MarcusCalhoun-Lopez |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → fixed |
| Status: | assigned → closed |
TCL Patch for private headers variant.