#17538 closed submission (fixed)
py25-protobuf-2.0.3 new port
| Reported by: | stromnov (Andrey Stromnov) | Owned by: | blair (Blair Zajac) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.6.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | py25-protobuf |
Description
Obsoletes #16771
Attachments (3)
Change History (10)
Changed 16 years ago by stromnov (Andrey Stromnov)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by blair (Blair Zajac)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to blair@… |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by blair (Blair Zajac)
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by blair (Blair Zajac)
And can you supply the necessary code to run the test suite? Then it should be good for me to commit it.
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by stromnov (Andrey Stromnov)
I'd attached two new files:
- protobuf-py.Portfile - new portfile with changed naming scheme to protobuf-py
- py-protobuf-test.tar.gz - simple test code (adapted from protobuf/examples)
Changed 16 years ago by stromnov (Andrey Stromnov)
| Attachment: | Portfile.2 added |
|---|
Changed 16 years ago by stromnov (Andrey Stromnov)
| Attachment: | py-protobuf-test.tar.gz added |
|---|
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by blair (Blair Zajac)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Thanks, fixed in r43625 and r43630. Also added 2.4 port in r43631. I didn't make a 2.6 port since there is no MacPorts group for Python 2.6 yet, but this may be coming in 1.7 (I haven't checked).
The port is named protobuf-python25.
When I asked for a test suite, I assumed there was one provided in the package already you could just run, but that turned out not to be the case, so thanks for writing it.
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Type: | enhancement → submission |
|---|
comment:7 Changed 16 years ago by (none)
| Milestone: | Port Submissions |
|---|
Milestone Port Submissions deleted
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I'm thinking we should name this protobuf-py25 instead. There are a many ports of protobufs to other languages and having a protobuf-XXX would be more consistent. There's already a protobuf-c Port.