Opened 16 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#19431 closed defect (duplicate)
proctools-0.4pre1 Compile error - fails to compile with coreutils +with_default_names
Reported by: | mike@… | Owned by: | akitada@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.7.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | kenyon@… | |
Port: | proctools |
Description
Proctools fails to compile with coreutils built and installed with +with_default_names as GNU's tsort does not have the necessary "-q" option.
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to akitada@… |
---|---|
Port: | proctools added |
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by mike@…
I disagree.
Possible solutions:
- Call
/usr/bin/tsort
rather than justtsort
- Don't use the
-q
option as it seems to just hide output and just pipe stdout to /dev/null instead - Present a warning message to the user
I don't think doing nothing is the best option.
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by akitada@…
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
Thanks for the report. Would you provide a patch for this?
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by mike@…
Not sure exactly what to patch, it seems vaguely nontrivial. Might be worth just putting up a warning.
comment:7 Changed 15 years ago by dj_mook@…
Temporarily deactivating coreutils to install procutils worked to get it installed.
It seems that if you want the specific behvaior of a system supplied tool you should explicitly reference it (/usr/bin/tsort). This is usually good scripting practice anyway when you are not sure of the environment you are being executed in.
comment:10 Changed 14 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
#20748 is our solution to this, report a bug upstream if you'd like them to change what they do.
So, don't use
coreutils +with_default_names
. I don't think there is a better solution.