#20733 closed update (fixed)
konversation update to 1.2-alpha6
Reported by: | jeremy.laine@… | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.7.1 |
Keywords: | kde kde4 | Cc: | |
Port: | konversation |
Description
Please find attached a patch to update konversation to the KDE4-based version 1.2-alpha6. The "alpha" label is misleading, it works fine for daily use and is the current version in Debian:
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
Changed 15 years ago by jeremy.laine@…
Attachment: | konversation.patch added |
---|
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
comment:2 follow-up: 5 Changed 15 years ago by jeremy.laine@…
OK your call. My goal in updating konversation was simply to allow people to have a kde4-only setup.
On a related note can the "~" (tilda) sign be used in version numbers like in Debian to ensure that version 1.2~alpha6 is lesser than 1.2?
Changed 15 years ago by nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne)
Attachment: | Portfile-konversation.diff added |
---|
patch was against an older version. this is updated and adds kdepimlibs4 to depends_lib
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne)
I'm all for updating these KDE packages, even if they're alpha.
Jeremy, can you let me know if the patch is good? I can't test it yet because of the akonadi port being out of date.
comment:4 Changed 15 years ago by nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Committed in r55924
comment:5 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to jeremy.laine@…:
On a related note can the "~" (tilda) sign be used in version numbers like in Debian to ensure that version 1.2~alpha6 is lesser than 1.2?
To my knowledge, that's not a convention we've ever used in MacPorts. Instead, once 1.2 is released, the port's epoch should be increased to accomplish the same.
Wouldn't it be better to wait for the developers to release the final version of 1.2 before updating the port? Presumably there is a reason 1.2-alpha6 is called alpha and not final.