Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#22982 closed defect (wontfix)
ZendFramework missing rails-style code generation toolset
Reported by: | tim.hawkins@… | Owned by: | nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.8.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | |
Port: | ZendFramework |
Description
Zend Framework installer does not install the bin directory from the original distribution, which means the Code Generators and the Tooling framework cannot be used.
Since version 1.8.x there is a rails style code generation toolset in ZF which is activated via the scripts
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to snc@… |
---|---|
Port: | ZendFramework added |
Summary: | Zendframewaork install is incomplete → Zendframework install is incomplete |
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | ryandesign@… added |
---|---|
Summary: | Zendframework install is incomplete → ZendFramework missing rails-style code generation toolset |
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne)
Tim, ZendFramework has been updated and Ryan's changes are applied. Do the files you're after show up now?
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 15 years ago by tim.hawkins@…
I will check it out, I have to build a new dev environment for another mac in the next few days.
comment:6 Changed 15 years ago by nerdling (Jeremy Lavergne)
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Closing, no updated information.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I'm unable to locate this rails-style code generation toolset in ZendFramework 1.10.0. Is it still there? If so, please point out exactly which directories or files you're talking about.
After the changes I propose in #23454, the ZendFramework port should be installing every file included with the distribution (if it doesn't already). So if the files are there, they should be installed, although perhaps not in the most logical place (if that's the case, let us know what the more logical place would be).