#23159 closed defect (fixed)
subversion is not a result for port search svn
| Reported by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | Owned by: | danielluke (Daniel J. Luke) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 1.8.2 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | subversion |
Description
Could you modify the subversion port's description slightly so that "port search svn" would find it? Thanks.
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by danielluke (Daniel J. Luke)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 follow-up: 3 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Resolution: | fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
Actually, "port search svn" still doesn't find it. I guess "port search" doesn't look at the long description?
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by danielluke (Daniel J. Luke)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Actually, "port search svn" still doesn't find it. I guess "port search" doesn't look at the long description?
Ok, so what are you suggesting? base/ update to search long description? Another specific change to the subversion port? Were you asking me to go research how base/ implements 'port search' in order to get the results you want? :)
comment:4 Changed 15 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
I think the easiest fix is to put "svn" in the short description.
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Reported again on the list. It's not just the subversion port that's affected, actually; it's all subversion-related ports that don't already have "svn" in their names (so, all the bindings ports, for example). Fixed all (I think) of them in r67900.
comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by danielluke (Daniel J. Luke)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Fixed all (I think) of them in r67900.
Thanks for taking a look at this. I would have preferred a patch since most of these are not openmaintainer, though...
done (r62401)