Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#23465 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Please add Accelerate variant
Reported by: | tamyrvoll@… | Owned by: | har5ha |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Low | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | stechert@…, wa03 (Josh Lawrence) | |
Port: | octave |
Description
Recently the Octave (as well as py26-numpy) ports have started to depend on ATLAS. No reason have been given for this change. If the motivation is something other than actual bugs in Accelerate, a variant should be provided that let users avoid ATLAS (the build times for ATLAS are ridiculous, especially on older HW).
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by tamyrvoll@…
Cc: | tamyrvoll@… added |
---|
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Cc: | stechert@… added; tamyrvoll@… removed |
---|---|
Keywords: | atlas blas removed |
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to alakazam@… |
Version: | 1.8.2 |
Please remember to cc the maintainers, and note that you do not need to be in cc when you are the reporter.
comment:3 Changed 15 years ago by alakazam@…
Owner: | alakazam@… deleted |
---|
Changed 15 years ago by tenomoto (Takeshi Enomoto)
Attachment: | Portfile.diff added |
---|
comment:5 Changed 15 years ago by tenomoto (Takeshi Enomoto)
This is a duplicate of #22997, which asks no_atlas for Tiger PPC. So I don't know which one should be closed. I also had a problem building atlas for ppc64 due to a problem with gcc43. atlas does not have g95 variant. Even if gcc43 and atlas can be built it takes very long time. The attached Portfile works for me to build octave for ppc64.
comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Cc Me!