Opened 15 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#24439 closed update (wontfix)
Update arm-rtems-binutils and arm-rtems-gcc
Reported by: | jmgc | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | mkae (Marko Käning), mojca (Mojca Miklavec) |
Port: | arm-rtems-binutils arm-rtems-gcc |
Description
This two portfiles update the arm-rtems-binutils and arm-rtems-gcc to the new rtems 4.9.4.
Attachments (2)
Change History (8)
Changed 15 years ago by jmgc
Attachment: | arm-rtems-binutils_Portfile.patch added |
---|
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Keywords: | haspatch added |
---|---|
Port: | arm-rtems-binutils arm-rtems-gcc added |
Version: | 1.8.2 |
comment:2 follow-up: 3 Changed 13 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)
Cc: | mk@… added |
---|
I had a little trouble with the last chunk for arm-rtems-binutils, but that was easily fixable. Why are the checksums uncommented for arm-rtems-binutils?
When I try to use the patch for arm-rtems-gcc I get this:
patching file Portfile Hunk #5 FAILED at 97. Hunk #6 succeeded at 129 (offset 5 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 266. 2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Portfile.rej
I didn't do a further analysis, since livecheck shows for both ports much newer version by now.
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by mojca (Mojca Miklavec)
Cc: | mojca added |
---|
comment:6 Changed 6 years ago by mojca (Mojca Miklavec)
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
The rtems ports were deleted a while ago, see #31945.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Binutils Portfile attachment