Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#24693 closed update (fixed)
nettle-1.15 Portfile update for Snow Leopard
| Reported by: | exodusd@… | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | haspatch maintainer | Cc: | |
| Port: | nettle |
Description
A friend of mine has updated the Portfile to get nettle to compile on Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard. I've attached the updated Portfile and have also added him to the maintainers list in the Portfile.
Attachments (1)
Change History (6)
comment:1 Changed 15 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Type: | defect → update |
|---|---|
| Version: | 1.8.2 |
comment:2 Changed 15 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Keywords: | haspatch maintainer added |
|---|
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to ryandesign@… |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
Changed 15 years ago by exodusd@…
Portfile with configure option only for x86_64 arch
comment:4 Changed 15 years ago by exodusd@…
Replying to ryandesign@…:
#21447 says this would only be necessary for x86_64. Do you want to use --disable-assembler only on x86_64 or always? If always, then this changes how the software builds for users on i386, so a revision bump will be needed.
Yes, I think you are right. I'm sorry, I haven't been active on that project for a while, so i missed that ticket. Can you check if the new Portfile that I've just uploaded is correct? I've wrapped the configure.args in a "platform darwin x86_64" section, is that okay, or do I have to use "platform darwin 10" ?
comment:5 Changed 15 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Neither, actually; you check whether the variable ${configure.build_arch} is "x86_64". I made this change in r67083 along with adding the new maintainer.
In the future, please submit unified diffs, not full Portfiles, so we can more easily see what changes you are proposing.
#21447 says this would only be necessary for x86_64. Do you want to use --disable-assembler only on x86_64 or always? If always, then this changes how the software builds for users on i386, so a revision bump will be needed.