Opened 14 years ago

Closed 14 years ago

#25427 closed update (fixed)

encfs-1.5 Update to current stable release 1.6

Reported by: Markus.Ueberall@… Owned by: drkp (Dan Ports)
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 1.9.1
Keywords: haspatch Cc:
Port: encfs

Description

From the original 1.6.0 (July 17, 2010) Change Log:

  • allow symlink times to be modified.
  • try to maintain modtime during rename. Patch by p.kosseff.
  • fix compiler errors from gcc 4.x.
  • many build improvements for Mac OSX.
  • add commands to help script filesystem creation.
  • add multi-argument support to encfsctl encode/decode commands. Patch by Nikratio.
  • support for boost > 1.41 (tested with boost 1.42 & boost 1.43).

I'm currently using this w/ the boost 1.42.0_0 port.

Attachments (1)

Portfile-encfs.diff​ (1000 bytes) - added by Markus.Ueberall@… 14 years ago.
Portfile diff (updated checksums, now using three part version number)

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (11)

comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Cc: dports@… added; eridius@… removed
Owner: changed from macports-tickets@… to eridius@…

Over to maintainer, though he may have abandoned the port so we might end up declaring a timeout.

comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by kballard (Lily Ballard)

Oh my, yes, I've definitely abandoned my ports. Do whatever you want with them.

comment:3 in reply to:  2 ; Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Replying to eridius@…:

Oh my, yes, I've definitely abandoned my ports. Do whatever you want with them.

I figured as much but wasn't sure since you were still listed as maintainer. OK if I change them all to nomaintainer?

And thanks for all your past work on the FUSE ports. (I'm maintaining some of them now.)

comment:4 in reply to:  3 ; Changed 14 years ago by kballard (Lily Ballard)

Replying to dports@…:

I figured as much but wasn't sure since you were still listed as maintainer. OK if I change them all to nomaintainer?

Sure thing

comment:5 in reply to:  4 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Replying to eridius@…:

Replying to dports@…:

I figured as much but wasn't sure since you were still listed as maintainer. OK if I change them all to nomaintainer?

Sure thing

Did this in r69376.

comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Owner: changed from eridius@… to dports@…
Status: new → assigned

comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

I'm a little puzzled by the version numbering -- the encfs webpage calls the latest version '1.6.0', the distfile is '1.6-1', and the port is just '1.6'. I feel like the port's version should match one or the other, but I can't tell which! Does this make any more sense to you?

Do you want to maintain the encfs port?

comment:8 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Cc: dports@… removed

comment:9 in reply to:  7 Changed 14 years ago by Markus.Ueberall@…

Replying to dports@&:

I'm a little puzzled by the version numbering -- the encfs webpage calls the latest version '1.6.0', the distfile is '1.6-1', and the port is just '1.6'.

Apart from the distfile, every distribution I came across uses the three part version number from the webpage... so I guess it wouldn't hurt to follow suit. I changed the Portfile diff accordingly.

Do you want to maintain the encfs port?

Can do. :)

Changed 14 years ago by Markus.Ueberall@…

Attachment: Portfile-encfs.diff​ added

Portfile diff (updated checksums, now using three part version number)

comment:10 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)

Resolution: → fixed
Status: assigned → closed

Committed in r69410 (with a couple of changes to distname and worksrcdir for the three-part version numbers)

Thanks for maintaining the port.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.