#25778 closed defect (fixed)
texlive-bin wants to install /opt/local/bin/man and /opt/local/bin/latexmk symlinks
Reported by: | vinc17@… | Owned by: | drkp (Dan Ports) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.9.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | texlive-bin |
Description
I get the following error:
---> Activating texlive-bin @2009_3+motif Error: Target org.macports.activate returned: Image error: /opt/local/bin/man is being used by the active man port. Please deactivate this port first, or use 'port -f activate texlive-bin' to force the activation.
It also tries to install /opt/local/bin/latexmk, which is already provided by the latexmk port (and the latexmk.pl in texlive is outdated).
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by vinc17@…
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to dports@… |
---|---|
Port: | texlive-bin added |
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)
Fixed for texlive-bin in r70023, although I still need to make texlive-bin-extra not install latexmk files.
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
r70026 replaces the latexmk files installed by texlive-bin-extra with a dependency on the latexmk port.
comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by vinc17@…
Note that there are other symlinks that are installed with no corresponding executable, such as ${prefix}/bin/epspdf. I wonder whether this makes any sense to install them. This may also be a problem if another port provides the utility in question.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Uh. You're right. I have no idea why texlive wants to install its own
man
binary.Will remove that and have it pull in latexmk from the port instead.