Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#27160 closed update (fixed)
docbook-xsl: update to version 1.76.1
| Reported by: | oksmith77 | Owned by: | boeyms@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | |
| Port: | docbook-xsl |
Description
I've updated the portfile for:
textproc/docbook-xsl
Attachments (2)
Change History (10)
Changed 14 years ago by oksmith77
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by oksmith77
comment:2 follow-up: 4 Changed 14 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to boeyms@… |
|---|---|
| Port: | docbook-xsl added; textproc/docbook-xsl removed |
| Summary: | UPDATE textproc/docbook-xsl → UPDATE textproc/docbook-xsl to version 1.76.1 |
| Version: | 1.9.1 |
Please remember to cc the maintainer. For updates to existing portfiles, a unified diff is preferred rather than attaching the complete file.
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by oksmith77
I've attached the unified diff file as requested.
I hope this helps.
Thanks.
Replying to jmr@…:
Please remember to cc the maintainer. For updates to existing portfiles, a unified diff is preferred rather than attaching the complete file.
comment:5 follow-up: 7 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Cc: | ryandesign@… added; oksmith@… removed |
|---|---|
| Summary: | UPDATE textproc/docbook-xsl to version 1.76.1 → docbook-xsl: update to version 1.76.1 |
This patch does not work because it removes the checksums for the documentation distfile, which makes the +doc variant fail.
Why does this patch switch to a zip distfile? the zip distfile is larger than the tar.gz distfile. Why not switch to the tar.bz2 distfile which is smaller than either of them?
comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
I am inclined to delete the +doc variant and make the port always install the documentation.
comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Why does this patch switch to a zip distfile? the zip distfile is larger than the tar.gz distfile. Why not switch to the tar.bz2 distfile which is smaller than either of them?
Er, wait, the port was already using a tar.bz2 distfile. So the question then is just why switch to a zip distfile? I'm inclined not to do so, since as mentioned the tar.bz2 file is smaller.
comment:8 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Fixed in r73411.
updated to version 1.76.1