Opened 14 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#28351 closed update (fixed)
Octave 3.4.0 released
Reported by: | lukas.reichlin@… | Owned by: | michaelld (Michael Dickens) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.9.2 |
Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt), tim.lahey@… |
Port: | octave |
Description
I modified the octave-devel Portfile for Octave 3.4.0. However, it should be released as octave, not octave-devel. There are still issues with plotting, command "figure" leads to "warning: no graphical display found".
Furthermore, I released my control-2.0.0 package. You can install it by
pkg install -forge control
inside Octave.
test_control
must not fail. If it does, it's due to erroneous Atlas/Lapack settings. The file "README.MacOS" from
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/
might be of interest.
Best Regards,
Lukas
Attachments (2)
Change History (16)
Changed 14 years ago by lukas.reichlin@…
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | ryandesign@… added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to stechert@… |
Port: | octave added |
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
If there are issues with it, then it should be a "devel" release IMHO. I don't see any issue with just keeping updating octave-devel; it does the same thing as "octave", just with a different version.
comment:4 follow-up: 6 Changed 14 years ago by lukas.reichlin@…
It has been 5 weeks since I posted the Octave 3.4.0 Portfile and seemingly nothing happened. Hopefully it is due to a lack of manpower, not a lack of interest.
@ryandesign: IIRC it is based on my Octave 3.3.92 Portfile. Given the fact that diff and FileMerge are able to compare one file to any other, creating a patch to any existing Portfile you like should not be an issue.
@michaelld: Octave 3.4.0 fixes some long-standing bugs. Personally I rely on two of these fixes.
comment:6 follow-up: 9 Changed 14 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Cc: | lukas.reichlin@… removed |
---|
Replying to lukas.reichlin@…:
It has been 5 weeks since I posted the Octave 3.4.0 Portfile and seemingly nothing happened. Hopefully it is due to a lack of manpower, not a lack of interest.
@ryandesign: IIRC it is based on my Octave 3.3.92 Portfile. Given the fact that diff and FileMerge are able to compare one file to any other, creating a patch to any existing Portfile you like should not be an issue.
@michaelld: Octave 3.4.0 fixes some long-standing bugs. Personally I rely on two of these fixes.
Posting a diff will help move this along. It saves time for the committers and makes us more likely to commit it. Especially given that the maintainer is not responding.
Changed 13 years ago by yaseppochi (Stephen J. Turnbull)
Attachment: | octave-devel.diff added |
---|
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by yaseppochi (Stephen J. Turnbull)
Replying to macsforever2000@…:
Posting a diff will help move this along. It saves time for the committers and makes us more likely to commit it. Especially given that the maintainer is not responding.
Diff attached, for the sake of posterity (I'm going to move to octave-devel). Diff is against octave-devel, and is trivial (minimum necessary to download and verify the sources, and identify the version).
The octave-devel Portfile looks cleaner to me at a glance, but it is substantially different, not only to support additional dependencies of octave 3.4, but also in its internal port logic (eg, variants). I can understand the reluctance of the octave maintainer to make the jump without careful review (if that's why the delays).
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Keywords: | haspatch added |
---|
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
Please see ticket #29517 for further discussion.
comment:13 Changed 13 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | michaelld@… removed |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from stechert@… to michaelld@… |
Michael, I'm assigning this to you, as Andre Stechert is no longer maintaining octave (r78753), so since you maintain octave-devel, you might want to take over octave as well.
comment:14 Changed 13 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Could you submit a diff, please, instead of a complete portfile? If this is more based on the octave-devel port than the octave port, feel free to base your patch off the octave-devel port.