Opened 13 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#33011 closed enhancement (fixed)
transmission 2.42 add variant daemon
| Reported by: | jon.olsson@… | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | bitmail@…, quintas@…, cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) |
| Port: | transmission |
Description
Included is a patch which adds a variant that builds the daemon bits and installs them.
I'm not sure if this should be broken out into a separate port, but I think it'll be easier to maintain updates to the port like this
Attachments (2)
Change History (12)
Changed 13 years ago by jon.olsson@…
| Attachment: | transmission.patch added |
|---|
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Keywords: | haspatch added |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to mnick@… |
| Port: | transmission added |
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by jon.olsson@…
I will look into subporting and creating startup items tonight.
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by jon.olsson@…
I'm not really sure how to go about splitting it into a subport, I've been looking at some sample Portfiles, but it is not entirely obvious.
I'll attach what I've currently got.
Changed 13 years ago by jon.olsson@…
| Attachment: | transmission-Portfile-subport added |
|---|
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 13 years ago by bitmail@…
I wonder if it would be possible to add an qt variant as well. ATM the GUI version of transmission can't be build on PPC/Leopard. The X11 port is outdated (v. 1.73). The daemon and the cli client can be build on PPC/Leopard. A qt version would give users on said legacy systems a GUI, without the need to run a X11 server.
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Cc: | bitmail@… added |
|---|---|
| Type: | update → enhancement |
Replying to bitmail@…:
I wonder if it would be possible to add an qt variant as well.
File a separate ticket for this request, please.
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by djlambert (Derek J. Lambert)
I'd second the request for a daemon variant/subport.
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Owner: | changed from mnick@… to macports-tickets@… |
|---|---|
| Version: | 2.0.3 |
mnick has retired.
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Cc: | quintas@… added |
|---|
Cc reporter of duplicate #38362.
comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Thanks for the patch - r121119
Ideally, it would be implemented as a subport (not a separate port, not a variant).
Should there be a startupitem to start the daemon? Should it be called "server" instead of "daemon", to match the naming of other ports?