#33144 closed enhancement (wontfix)
Would be nice if py27-rbtools installed post-review instead of post-review-2.7
Reported by: | mkae (Marko Käning) | Owned by: | singingwolfboy@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.0.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | py27-rbtools |
Description
Hi singingwolfboy,
I've got several parallel MacPorts installations on my machine and I tripped over the following problem:
On installation 1 I installed port py-rbtools. A necessary dep is py24-rbtools and python24 etc. then.
On installation 2 I installed port py27-rbtools, because I wanted to avoid having to install all the python24 stuff. So far so good.
But when I call post-review on my 2nd installation the executable can't be found since it is named post-review-2.7 in that case.
I'd actually prefer if py27-rbtools could not be installed with py24-rbtools in place.
I understood that py*-rbtools are all handled by the py-rbtools portfile, so I guess it is impossible to mark the versions from 24 to 27 as conflicting with each other.
But I'd prefer if the py27-rbtools port would also create a post-review executable.
That would ease things a bit, since then I would have only one entry for the post-review in my ~/.gitconfig like this:
[alias] post-review = !post-review --guess-summary --guess-description --username=kaning --parent=master --tracking-branch=origin/master --target-groups=kmymoney
Anyway, this is just a thought for improvement of the portfile, since another workaround for me is to get rid of py24-rbtools completely and install py27-rbtools on all my MP installations. :-)
Greets, Marko
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)
Summary: | py-rbtools misses dependency to py-simplejson → Would be nice if py27-rbtools installed post-review instead of post-review-2.7 |
---|
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by singingwolfboy@…
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by mkae (Marko Käning)
OK, I expected something like this. Thanks for your response.
I worked around it by just installing rb27-tools on all my MP installations.
No problem.
Macports is designed to allow installations of Python (for example, 2.4 and 2.7) to exist side-by-side without interfering with each other, including executables installed by modules like rbtools. All these executables get a suffix of the version of Python they use, except for Python 2.4 -- and that exception is only for backwards compatibility reasons. If you want "post-review" executable without a suffix, I suggest you create an executable symbolic link pointing at the version you want, and put that symbolic link on your path. For example, you can have a "local/bin" directory in your home directory, have a "post-review" symlink in that directory that points at /opt/local/bin/post-review-2.7, and put "~/local/bin" in your PATH environment variable.