#33941 closed update (fixed)
zeroinstall-injector update
| Reported by: | dave@… | Owned by: | afb@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | drkp (Dan Ports) | |
| Port: | zeroinstall-injector |
Attachments (1)
Change History (15)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Cc: | afb removed |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to afb@… |
comment:2 follow-up: 4 Changed 13 years ago by afb@…
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Updated, r91736.
Didn't change distfiles or checksum types.
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by afb@…
| Version: | 2.0.4 |
|---|
Also added a test phase, and a small patch to make it pass:
Result <unittest._TextTestResult run=214 errors=0 failures=0>
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by dave@…
comment:5 follow-up: 8 Changed 13 years ago by afb@…
You only need to change "distfiles" if there is something wrong with the default value.
comment:6 follow-up: 10 Changed 13 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)
| Cc: | dports@… added |
|---|
Does this really require py26-xml? This is one of the few ports depending on py-xml, which is obsolete enough that we should try to remove it: see ticket:32090:comment:12
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by drkp (Dan Ports)
or, in correct wikiformatting, comment:ticket:32090:12
comment:8 follow-up: 9 Changed 13 years ago by dave@…
Replying to afb@…:
You only need to change "distfiles" if there is something wrong with the default value.
Sheesh. That is so not an answer to the question I asked. Trying to learn something here. How does MacPorts know where to find the archive when there's no value set for distfiles in the Portfile?
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by afb@…
Replying to dave@…:
Sheesh. That is so not an answer to the question I asked. Trying to learn something here. How does MacPorts know where to find the archive when there's no value set for distfiles in the Portfile?
The default value for distfiles includes the distname (which in turn is based on name and version) and the extract.suffix (which in turn is affected by use_bzip2).
comment:10 Changed 13 years ago by afb@…
Replying to dports@…:
Does this really require py26-xml? This is one of the few ports depending on py-xml, which is obsolete enough that we should try to remove it: see ticket:32090:comment:12
It probably doesn't, no.
comment:11 Changed 13 years ago by dave@…
| Resolution: | fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
Well, using Python 2.7 breaks feeds like 0publish. Attaching a fix.
Changed 13 years ago by dave@…
| Attachment: | Portfile.patch added |
|---|
comment:12 follow-up: 14 Changed 13 years ago by afb@…
It doesn't say what the breakage is, but python27 could be made into a variant.
comment:13 Changed 13 years ago by afb@…
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Added +python26 and +python27 variants in r91794.
comment:14 Changed 13 years ago by dave@…
Replying to afb@…:
It doesn't say what the breakage is, but python27 could be made into a variant.
I'm presuming you saw my report about the breakage in the 0install mailing list.
The Cc field must contain complete email addresses.
We prefer updates be submitted as unified diffs attached directly to the ticket.