Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#34867 closed defect (fixed)
rb19-hpricot: install fails when ruby19 +nosuffix is installed
Reported by: | sean.dwyer@… | Owned by: | singingwolfboy@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | rb19-hpricot |
Description
When installing rb19-hpricot after having installed ruby19 with the nosuffix variant, rb19-hpricot fails. The main.log indicated that it couldn't find /opt/local/bin/gem1.9. Creating a symlink from /opt/local/bin/gem to /opt/local/bin/gem1.9 fixed the problem and allowed rb19-hpricot to finish installing, though rb19-hpricot should probably be able to handle this situation without intervention. Unfortunately, I didn't think to make a copy of main.log before making the symlink and re-running "port install", so the log file with the exact details is gone.
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to singingwolfboy@… |
---|---|
Port: | rb19-hpricot added |
Summary: | Installing rb19-hpricot fails when ruby19 +nosuffix is installed → rb19-hpricot: install fails when ruby19 +nosuffix is installed |
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by g5pw (Aljaž Srebrnič)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I think the same reasoning as for #25896 applies here. I'm closing the ticket.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
I would venture to guess that no rb19 port supports ruby +nosuffix. That's the problem with variants that change were things are installed / how things are named, and why we probably shouldn't have variants like that. There should instead be a ruby_select port.