#35219 closed update (fixed)
indi: update to 0.9.1
| Reported by: | fcasarramona | Owned by: | jtomshine@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.1 |
| Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
| Port: | indi |
Description
Upgrade Indi port to 0.9.1 version.
Also I request to became mantainer because jtomshine didn't apply the last update.
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
Changed 12 years ago by fcasarramona
| Attachment: | Portfile-indi.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Cc: | ryandesign@… added; jtomshine@… removed |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | haspatch added |
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to jtomshine@… |
| Summary: | Upgrade Indi to 0.9.1 → indi: update to 0.9.1 |
Ferran, thanks for the update. Note that we would prefer unified diffs instead of contextual diffs. Note that the first revision of a given version of a port should be 0 not 1, and that this can be accomplished by simply deleting the revision line.
Jonathan, are you still interested in maintaining this port or would you like to hand maintainership over to Ferran?
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by fcasarramona
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Ferran, thanks for the update. Note that we would prefer unified diffs instead of contextual diffs. Note that the first revision of a given version of a port should be 0 not 1, and that this can be accomplished by simply deleting the revision line.
Jonathan, are you still interested in maintaining this port or would you like to hand maintainership over to Ferran?
Thanks Ryan,
I attached the unified diff.
Changed 12 years ago by fcasarramona
| Attachment: | Portfile-indi-u.diff added |
|---|
Uniffied diff definitive.
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by fcasarramona
I leaved a new unified diff removing the revision.
Seems Jonathan doesn't maintain anymore this port. Can we proceed?
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Thanks. I have committed the update in r95780. It now seems to compile with clang so I removed the lines that changed the compiler to llvm-gcc-4.2.
I did not change the maintainers line because I'd like to give the previous maintainer one last chance. I've filed a port abandonment ticket: #35276. If he does not respond, would you also like to maintain the libnova port?
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by fcasarramona
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Thanks. I have committed the update in r95780. It now seems to compile with clang so I removed the lines that changed the compiler to llvm-gcc-4.2.
I did not change the maintainers line because I'd like to give the previous maintainer one last chance. I've filed a port abandonment ticket: #35276. If he does not respond, would you also like to maintain the libnova port?
I don't have any expertise with libnova. I think is better to leave maintainance open.
Indi Portfile diff