#36257 closed enhancement (fixed)
xraylib 2.16.0_1: missing license
Reported by: | ci42 | Owned by: | Tom.Schoonjans@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | xraylib |
Description
Please state the license in the portfile (license keyword). If permitted by the license MacPorts provides binary packages for Snow Leopard and Lion.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by Tom.Schoonjans@…
Changed 12 years ago by Tom.Schoonjans@…
Attachment: | Portfile.diff added |
---|
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by ci42
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Thanks, r97991. Binary packages are now available: http://packages.macports.org/xraylib/
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by Tom.Schoonjans@…
Thanks!
The binary packages do not seem to carry the correct revision number though: I think it should be 2...
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 12 years ago by ci42
The revision number comes directly from the portfile. So revision 1 is correct.
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 12 years ago by Tom.Schoonjans@…
Replying to ciserlohn@…:
The revision number comes directly from the portfile. So revision 1 is correct.
Oh, it appears you took the first Portfile.diff... I uploaded two: only the second one has the correct revision number (saw it too late myself). I'm not sure it really matters though since no rebuild is necessary
comment:6 Changed 12 years ago by ci42
Replying to Tom.Schoonjans@…:
Replying to ciserlohn@…:
The revision number comes directly from the portfile. So revision 1 is correct.
Oh, it appears you took the first Portfile.diff... I uploaded two: only the second one has the correct revision number (saw it too late myself). I'm not sure it really matters though since no rebuild is necessary
The revision must be increased only if the files the port installs change or a rebuild should be enforced (e.g if a port/lib linked against has an incompatible change). Neither is the case with your changes, so we can stay with revision 1.
I've included the license information (and fixed a small bug in the port file).
Best,
Tom