Opened 12 years ago
Last modified 10 years ago
#36748 new defect
ext2fuse: mounted filesystem not readable (PPC or 32bit issue?)
| Reported by: | mklein-de (Michael Klein) | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.2 |
| Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | mkae (Marko Käning), cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) |
| Port: | ext2fuse |
Description
- ext2fuse 0.8.1
- fuse4x 0.9.2
File systems mount ok on 10.5.8/PPC, but any operation on the mounted file system results in an Input/output error.
$ pkg-config fuse --cflags -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE -I/opt/local/include/fuse
After rebuilding ext2fuse with -D_DARWIN_USE_64_BIT_INODE everything seems to work fine
Attachments (5)
Change History (15)
Changed 12 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
| Attachment: | Portfile.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
Replying to ryandesign@…:
Is using 64-bit inodes safe for all versions of OS X (Tiger and up) on all four architectures? I don't know.
Me neither. I'm attaching a new patch that makes the Portfile use pkg-config instead.
Changed 12 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
| Attachment: | Portfile.2.diff added |
|---|
comment:4 follow-up: 6 Changed 11 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Is this still relevant now that fuse4x has been replaced by osxfuse?
comment:6 follow-up: 10 Changed 10 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
Replying to egall@…:
Is this still relevant now that fuse4x has been replaced by osxfuse?
yes, the issue persists with osxfuse
Changed 10 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
| Attachment: | Portfile.3.diff added |
|---|
Updated Portfile
comment:7 follow-up: 8 Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
@michael.klein: Your patch will need to be updated because the revision of this port is currently 2. Why are you putting configure.cflags and cppflags arguments in a pre-configure block?
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
Replying to mf2k@…:
@michael.klein: Your patch will need to be updated because the revision of this port is currently 2. Why are you putting configure.cflags and cppflags arguments in a pre-configure block?
that's because of the exec, otherwise pkg-config would be executed every time the Portfile is read (IIRC)
Changed 10 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
| Attachment: | Portfile.4.diff added |
|---|
Updated Portfile
comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
This patch does not build for me on Mavericks. attaching the main.log.
Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by mklein-de (Michael Klein)
Replying to michael.klein@…:
Replying to egall@…:
Is this still relevant now that fuse4x has been replaced by osxfuse?
yes, the issue persists with osxfuse
ah, forget it. osxfuse is Intel-only anyway. Don't know what I tested back then.
now that fuse4x has been replaced by osxfuse means that there is no way to get ext2fuse running on a PPC Mac at all.
Time to move to Linux, it seems,
Is using 64-bit inodes safe for all versions of OS X (Tiger and up) on all four architectures? I don't know.