Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#37605 closed enhancement (fixed)
MacVim @7.3.snapshot66_1: License conflict preventing binary distribution
Reported by: | larryv (Lawrence Velázquez) | Owned by: | raimue (Rainer Müller) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | MacVim |
Description
MacVim
currently requires openssl
via python27
to build, which introduces the dreaded GPL/OpenSSL license conflict. Is it possible to mark python27
as license_noconflict
(for the non-Python variants, anyway) so that we can build an archive?
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by raimue (Rainer Müller)
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:2 follow-up: 3 Changed 12 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Potential use of static libraries, it seems?
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Replying to larryv@…:
Potential use of static libraries, it seems?
Among other things. As another example, some ports have depends_build port:boost
because they only use its headers. Just because you don't link with a .a or .dylib doesn't mean you're not creating a derivative work.
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Fixed in r101901. Thanks, raimue.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
python27 is only a build dependency unless +python27 (or any other +pythonXY variant) is selected. Why does this prevent distribution in the first place as it is not required at runtime?