#37666 closed defect (fixed)
torsocks is not a replacement for tsocks
| Reported by: | GregoryEAllen (Greg Allen) | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.2 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Port: | tsocks |
Description (last modified by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt))
torsocks may claim to be a replacement for tsocks, but it is not. torsocks is a socks proxy over tor. For use over a normal SOCKS proxy, torsocks appears not to work. [also see #36808] Is there some reason we can't keep both tsocks and torsocks in macports?
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Port: | tsocks added |
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to ryandesign@… |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
At the time that I marked tsocks replaced_by torsocks I thought they were equivalent software. Since it has now turned out that they are not, we should revert that.