Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
#3790 closed defect (invalid)
UPDATE: expect-5.43.0
Reported by: | mark.duling@… | Owned by: | IOOI-SqAR |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 1.0 |
Keywords: | Cc: | darwinports-bugs@…, olegb@… | |
Port: |
Description
expect-5.43.0
Since the tcl port is now fixed to copy all its headers to ${prefix}/include (see bug 3777), the expect port no longer needs to download tcl to link to the tcl headers.
So I fixed the expect-5.43.0 port to not download tcl and to find the tcl headers that are installed by the fixed tcl port with: --with-tclinclude="${prefix}/include"
A diff file is attached. I tried to assign this to the maintainer iooi@… but I get the message: Assignee: iooi@… did not match anything
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
Changed 19 years ago by mark.duling@…
Attachment: | Portfile.diff added |
---|
comment:1 Changed 19 years ago by olegb@…
Cc: | olegb@… added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from darwinports-bugs@… to lars.sonchocky-helldorf@… |
what says the maintainer?
comment:2 Changed 19 years ago by olegb@…
Cc: | darwinports-bugs@… added |
---|
adding darwinports-bug-we-love-them-and-want-more@ as cc, because i am gone 2 weeks without IP
comment:3 Changed 19 years ago by mark.duling@…
(In reply to comment #2)
what says the maintainer?
I followed the instructions to assign the bug to him but: Assignee: iooi@… did not match anything
I'm not sure if you're suggesting that I email him directly, but I will.
comment:4 Changed 19 years ago by olegb@…
I followed the instructions to assign the bug to him but: Assignee: iooi@… did not match anything
I'm not sure if you're suggesting that I email him directly, but I will.
It was not critisism, I was just wondering what Lars (who maintains) the port though about the patch, I really think he should give his OK to this (And change the maintaineradress to something bugzilla knows :-) )
comment:5 Changed 19 years ago by mark.duling@…
(In reply to comment #5)
It was not critisism, I was just wondering what Lars (who maintains) the port though about the patch, I really think he should give his OK to this (And change the maintaineradress to something bugzilla knows :-) )
I see. Yes that'd be great if the maintainer could evaluate it. I thought that was perhaps what you meant but I wan't sure. In any case, I didn't take the comments as criticism. Especially since the DarwinPorts folks seem to me to be always courteous.
comment:6 Changed 19 years ago by mark.duling@…
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
It turned out there were wider issues with Tcl headers that made the enhancement I proposed for the expect port not acceptable so I'm closing this bug.
A unified diff of the proposed changes