Opened 19 years ago

Closed 19 years ago

#3796 closed defect (fixed)

UPDATE: exim-4.52

Reported by: jbc@… Owned by: cms@…
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 1.0
Keywords: Cc: mww@…
Port:

Description

exim-4.52

Port file attached (with any sort of luck)

Bump version to 4.52. Also finally fixed issue with Berkeley DB (bug #1975); exim will now work with dports-installed db4 format for both its internal hints db and user external lookups. Also incorporates changes from last update I submiited, most importantly the change to exiscan as a built-in compile- time option rather than a patch

If anyone knows a way to *insert* the include path with reinplace, please feel free to modify my crude replace-a-comment method!

Attachments (3)

Portfile (4.9 KB) - added by jbc@… 19 years ago.
exim-4.52 portfile
Portfile.2 (4.9 KB) - added by jbc@… 19 years ago.
exim-4.52 portfile (corrected)
Portfile.3 (4.7 KB) - added by jbc@… 19 years ago.
exim-4.52 portfile (fewer variants)

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (7)

Changed 19 years ago by jbc@…

Attachment: Portfile added

exim-4.52 portfile

Changed 19 years ago by jbc@…

Attachment: Portfile.2 added

exim-4.52 portfile (corrected)

comment:1 Changed 19 years ago by mww@…

Cc: mww@… added

is it really necessary to add another 4 variants to this already variant-blown Portfile? I suppose some variants are rather useful and can be made default, we simply never can test 210 possible outcomes (and think about packages - they will all be with no variant) Would you mind decreasing the variant count? (be it your new or existent ones..)

comment:2 Changed 19 years ago by jbc@…

(In reply to comment #3) If you've looked at the way exim enables features at compile time (by uncommenting lines) and the sheer number of options available, you probably have a feeling for why so many variants are appealing to different users, depending on their needs.

It would certainly be possible to limit the number of variants simply by enabling support for the various lookup options, etc. in the default DP build. Do you think this is preferable to letting the user choose these options as variants when they build the port? It would be easy enough to enable more options in the default config.

Changed 19 years ago by jbc@…

Attachment: Portfile.3 added

exim-4.52 portfile (fewer variants)

comment:3 Changed 19 years ago by jbc@…

attachments.isobsolete: 01

comment:4 Changed 19 years ago by michaelm@…

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

I've committed a version of this.

I've removed the mysql variant, leaving the mysql4 variant intact

I've removed the TLS variant and included that support by default, adding stuff to force the use of the ports openssl vs the OS

I've removed the LDAP variant as it adds no dependencies on OS X and doesn't hurt

I've removed the revision line as this is a new version, therefore the revision is 0 (and thus the default)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.