Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#38254 closed defect (fixed)
man and man2html conflict
Reported by: | cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) | Owned by: | mww@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | neverpanic (Clemens Lang) | |
Port: | man man2html |
Description
Installing man2html
while man
is active causes the following files to get moved aside:
Warning: File /opt/local/bin/man2html already exists. Moving to: /opt/local/bin/man2html.mp_1362264730. Warning: File /opt/local/share/man/man1/man2html.1.gz already exists. Moving to: /opt/local/share/man/man1/man2html.1.gz.mp_1362264730.
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Cc: | mww@… removed |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to mww@… |
Version: | 2.1.3 |
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
bumping because r111042 touched man2html but didn't fix this...
comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by neverpanic (Clemens Lang)
Marked as conflicting in r111119. How do other package management systems solve this conflict?
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 11 years ago by neverpanic (Clemens Lang)
Cc: | cal@… added |
---|
OK, Debian (and probably lots of other Linux distributions) doesn't have the problem, because they use man-db
from http://man-db.nongnu.org/ as their man
package. As their man2html
, they use http://users.actrix.gen.nz/michael/vhman2html.html which has been merged into http://primates.ximian.com/~flucifredi/man/, which is the source for our man
package. Our man2html
comes from http://dcssrv1.oit.uci.edu/indiv/ehood/man2html.html.
I suggest we obsolete the man2html
port in favor of our current man
port. Opinions?
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
Replying to cal@…:
I suggest we obsolete the
man2html
port in favor of our currentman
port. Opinions?
The main advantage I can see to having a separate man2html
port is that it doesn't drag in the long chain of dependencies that the man
port does. Other than that I don't really care.
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by neverpanic (Clemens Lang)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I agree the man port has a really long chain of dependencies. I'll leave this as-is.
It's been 3 weeks... maintainer timeout?