Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
#38673 closed submission (fixed)
gnome-js-common 0.1.2: new port required by Seed and Gjs
Reported by: | gui-dos (Guido Soranzio) | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.3 |
Keywords: | gnome | Cc: | cooljeanius (Eric Gallager), neverpanic (Clemens Lang), juanrgar (Juan R. García Blanco) |
Port: | gnome-js-common |
Description
gnome-js-common is required if/when trying to build Seed and Gjs. It iprovides tests and JavaScript code useful or common to both Seed and Gjs, the Gnome JavaScript interpreters using WebKit's JavaScriptCore and Mozilla's SpiderMonkey, respectively.
Attachments (1)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by gui-dos (Guido Soranzio)
I simply used the gnome-common port file as a template.
gnome-js-common just installs some JavaScripts and docs:
/opt/local/lib/gnome-js/ArrayUtils.js /opt/local/lib/gnome-js/JSON.js /opt/local/lib/gnome-js/lang.js /opt/local/lib/gnome-js/signals.js /opt/local/lib/gnome-js/tweener/equations.js /opt/local/lib/gnome-js/tweener/tweenList.js /opt/local/lib/gnome-js/tweener/tweener.js /opt/local/lib/pkgconfig/gnome-js-common.pc /opt/local/share/doc/gnome_js_common/AUTHORS /opt/local/share/doc/gnome_js_common/COPYING /opt/local/share/doc/gnome_js_common/ChangeLog /opt/local/share/doc/gnome_js_common/INSTALL /opt/local/share/doc/gnome_js_common/NEWS /opt/local/share/doc/gnome_js_common/README
I submitted a preliminary Portfile for Seed which requires gnome-js-common with #38676
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 12 years ago by neverpanic (Clemens Lang)
Cc: | cal@… added |
---|
Looks good to me. Since you have a macports handle I assume you also have commit access to MacPorts? Is there any reason why you're not just commiting this yourself?
comment:5 follow-ups: 6 8 Changed 12 years ago by gui-dos (Guido Soranzio)
Replying to cal@…:
Is there any reason why you're not just commiting this yourself?
I am waiting for the new webkit-gtk3 port I proposed on[ https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2013-April/thread.html#22523]
comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by juanrgar (Juan R. García Blanco)
Replying to gui_dos@…:
Replying to cal@…:
Is there any reason why you're not just commiting this yourself?
I am waiting for the new webkit-gtk3 port I proposed on[ https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2013-April/thread.html#22523]
Is this necessary? What is the relation between gnome-js-common and webkit-gtk? IMHO, this port, as it has been approved, should be uploaded ASAP, so gjs can also be uploaded, and we can all start hacking in JS ;)
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by gui-dos (Guido Soranzio)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Committed in r108966
Is
installs_libs no
really correct? If this port installs code that will be used by code in another port, that introduces the possibility of a license conflict.