#39327 closed submission (fixed)
New portfile for ITSOL: ITerative linear SOLvers
Reported by: | kingcrimson@… | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.1.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: | bpabbott@…, michaelld (Michael Dickens), cooljeanius (Eric Gallager) | |
Port: | itsol-2.0.0 |
Description
There is an ongoing GSoC project to integrate ITSOL in Octave So this library will soon become a dependence for octave and octave-devel.
This is my first attempt at creating a portfile so please bear with me if it is not perfect.
Attachments (1)
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
Cc: | mlk@… removed |
---|
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
Cc: | michaelld@… added |
---|
comment:3 follow-up: 5 Changed 11 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
- It's
revision
, notreversion
. This error preventsportindex
from parsing the portfile. - After fixing 1.,
port -v lint --nitpick
reports the following problems:eric-gallagers-macbook-pro:itsol root# port -v lint --nitpick ---> Verifying Portfile for itsol ... Warning: Line 5 should be a newline (after PortSystem) Warning: Line 42 has trailing whitespace before newline Warning: Line 50 has trailing whitespace before newline Warning: Line 62 has trailing whitespace before newline ... Error: Port revision is not numeric: 0.0.1 ... ---> 1 errors and 4 warnings found.
comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by kingcrimson@…
Replying to egall@…:
- It's
revision
, notreversion
. This error preventsportindex
from parsing the portfile.- After fixing 1.,
port -v lint --nitpick
reports the following problems:eric-gallagers-macbook-pro:itsol root# port -v lint --nitpick ---> Verifying Portfile for itsol ... Warning: Line 5 should be a newline (after PortSystem) Warning: Line 42 has trailing whitespace before newline Warning: Line 50 has trailing whitespace before newline Warning: Line 62 has trailing whitespace before newline ... Error: Port revision is not numeric: 0.0.1 ... ---> 1 errors and 4 warnings found.
Hi, I did fix these issues quite a while ago. Probably nobody noticed as I didn't add a comment ;) c.
comment:6 follow-up: 7 Changed 11 years ago by kingcrimson@…
I uploaded a new version to fix an issue with installation permissions c.
comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by kingcrimson@…
It seems a new Octave release is going to happen soon, and this port is going to be a prerequisite.
Is there any specific reason why this port is being held back? Any specific changes needed to get it accepted?
c.
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
Any reason: Too much to do in my queue; too little time! I'll take a look and see what comes of it.
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
I see that the fortran compiler is being required/used. Do you know if the fortran code will work with g95, or does it require a newer gfortran? My hope would be to use the fortran recipe slightly modified. I'll try to get to this in the next couple of day, but feel free to ping this ticket if nothing happens for a while. I have plenty on my queue.
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by kingcrimson@…
Thanks for looking into this!
I only ever tried with gfortran 4.7 and 4.8, but ITSOL only uses very standard fortran 77 so I guess it should work OK with g95. On the other hand I never managed to build recent Octave versions with g95, so I don't see much use in a g95 ITSOL variant ...
comment:11 Changed 11 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
I'm getting closer to having this port working; hopefully tomorrow. It's really not designed to build on OSX nor play nicely with MacPorts; it's not too difficult to coerce it into doing so (and, your help was a good starting point). That said, there are parts of this code which aren't really ready for prime time -- multiple definitions of a specific function in different files (e.g., lofC, add2is, add2com, indsetC, weightsC); maybe some of these are supposed to be static? The reason I'm getting these issues is because I'm creating a shared library version, which has more strict requirements than a static library. I haven't even gotten to the point of trying tests, and I certainly will do those to make sure these libraries work.
In order to do a shared library, I have to add +atlas and +accelerate, much like with octave; which is just fine, since if the new octave uses this project then they will have similar requirements. +g95 works just fine, btw, at least for me.
comment:12 follow-up: 13 Changed 11 years ago by michaelld (Michael Dickens)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Done in r112010. The project should fix a bunch of issues; my patches do the basics, but I'm not 100% sure I'm doing them correctly. I'm closing this ticket; if there are issues with itsol, please open a new ticket to address them.
comment:13 Changed 11 years ago by kingcrimson@…
Replying to michaelld@…:
Done in r112010. The project should fix a bunch of issues; my patches do the basics, but I'm not 100% sure I'm doing them correctly. I'm closing this ticket; if there are issues with itsol, please open a new ticket to address them.
cool, thanks! I'll try building Octave linking to this library and report back.
Cc Me!