Update goffice @0.8.17 to 0.10.3 with 0.8.17 subport

[c.herbig@…]

This patch allows gnucash to still function requiring goffice 0.8.x, while also allowing gnumeric to be updated to the 1.12.x series, and also allows gnome-chemistry-utils to be installed. The 0.8.17 subport still needs the patchfiles directory that is already there.

[c.herbig@…]

Sorry, I can't seem to add haspatch once it was submitted.

[c.herbig@…]

The gnumeric team has updated goffice to 0.10.4, but the files for the new gnumeric and goffice aren't available yet, hence why this is still pointing to 0.10.3.

[mf2k (Frank Schima)]

[deleted duplicate post]

[mf2k (Frank Schima)]

The epoch cannot be removed from the goffice port or else no one will see the update. Also, the epoch and revision should be removed from the goffice-08 sub-port.

[c.herbig@…]

Replying to macsforever2000@…:

The epoch cannot be removed from the goffice port or else no one will see the update. Also, the epoch and revision should be removed from the goffice-08 sub-port.

Ok, fixed. I re-read the documentation, and I think I understand it this time. For example, the only time epoch could be removed is if the version went from 0.10.x -> 1.0.0, is that correct?

[larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)]

Replying to c.herbig@…:

Ok, fixed. I re-read the documentation, and I think I understand it this time. For example, the only time epoch could be removed is if the version went from 0.10.x -> 1.0.0, is that correct?

A port’s epoch can never be removed or decreased, ever.

Think of a port’s real version as [epoch].[version].[revision]. A port at 1.x.y will always be considered newer than a port at 0.m.n. Removing a port’s epoch is equivalent to setting it to 0, so no one would ever see that update.

[c.herbig@…]

Replying to larryv@…:

Replying to c.herbig@…:

Ok, fixed. I re-read the documentation, and I think I understand it this time. For example, the only time epoch could be removed is if the version went from 0.10.x -> 1.0.0, is that correct?

A port’s epoch can never be removed or decreased, ever.

Think of a port’s real version as [epoch].[version].[revision]. A port at 1.x.y will always be considered newer than a port at 0.m.n. Removing a port’s epoch is equivalent to setting it to 0, so no one would ever see that update.

Ah, both of those make more sense now. Thank you.

[c.herbig@…]

I tidied up the subport section. It seems to work fine, and should be less maintenance.

[c.herbig@…]

brings goffice up to newly released 0.10.4

[drkp (Dan Ports)]

Thanks, committed in r108288. I renamed the subport to goffice08 to be in line with other port names, and added a deactivate hack to prevent conflicts when upgrading.