Opened 10 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#45198 closed defect (wontfix)
kaffe update to 1.1.9 fails, need libtool 1.5?
Reported by: | jul_bsd@… | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | cooljeanius (Eric Gallager), jul_bsd@…, chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez) | |
Port: | kaffe |
Description
Trying to build 1.1.9 (1.1.7 in ports)
- build fails
configure:22253: checking for library containing lt_dlcaller_register configure:22294: /usr/bin/clang -o conftest -pipe -Os -fstrict-aliasing -funroll-loops -L/opt/local/lib -arch i386 -I/opt/local/include -L/opt/local/lib -I/opt/local/include/freetype2 -L/opt/local/lib -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -arch i386 conftest.c >&5 Undefined symbols for architecture i386: "_lt_dlcaller_register", referenced from: _main in conftest-9687c1.o ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture i386 clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
http://www.kaffe.org/pipermail/kaffe/2008-July/191143.html seems to say it needs libtool 1.5 which is not in macports (only 2)
- add a warning/abandon software
maybe removing the port would be better...
Attachments (1)
Change History (9)
Changed 10 years ago by jul_bsd@…
Attachment: | patch-kaffe-Portfile.diff added |
---|
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by cooljeanius (Eric Gallager)
maybe removing the port would be better...
I think there's something in base (or maybe the Java PortGroup, or maybe it's just a common idiom, I forget) that automatically adds a dependency on bin:java:kaffe
for ports that use java... If we do remove kaffe, I'd like to see Landon's work on openjdk7 merged into trunk as a replacement for it, so that ports that currently depend on kaffe for java can depend on openjdk7 instead.
comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
Cc: | chrstphrchvz added |
---|
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
comment:7 Changed 5 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
I've opened #60206 to list which ports still use kaffe
as a fallback and should instead use the Java portgroup.
comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Thank you. We don't need to keep this ticket open then.
Since you're using the github portgroup, it's not expected for you to need to set master_sites, distname, worksrcdir, or livecheck.