Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#46026 closed defect (worksforme)
py27-scientific needs py27-netcdf4
Reported by: | Schamschula (Marius Schamschula) | Owned by: | seanfarley (Sean Farley) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.3.3 |
Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | petrrr |
Port: | py27-scientific |
Description
Even though py27-scientific has netcdf as a depends_lib, it also needs py27-netcdf4. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651502
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)
Cc: | sean@… removed |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from macports-tickets@… to sean@… |
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by seanfarley (Sean Farley)
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed 10 years ago by petrrr
BTW: Is the port:netcdf dependency really needed? Does py27-scientific link against netcdf
or is py27-netcdf4
sufficient as dependency?
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 10 years ago by Schamschula (Marius Schamschula)
Replying to petr@…:
BTW: Is the port:netcdf dependency really needed? Does py27-scientific link against
netcdf
or ispy27-netcdf4
sufficient as dependency?
I know that the build failed w/o py27-netcdf4. However, netcdf is a dependency of py27-netcdf4…
So I think it is safe to remove netcdf from depends_lib-append.
Changed 10 years ago by Schamschula (Marius Schamschula)
Attachment: | Portfile-py27-scientific.diff added |
---|
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by Schamschula (Marius Schamschula)
Replying to mschamschula@…:
Replying to petr@…:
BTW: Is the port:netcdf dependency really needed? Does py27-scientific link against
netcdf
or ispy27-netcdf4
sufficient as dependency?I know that the build failed w/o py27-netcdf4. However, netcdf is a dependency of py27-netcdf4…
So I think it is safe to remove netcdf from depends_lib-append.
Removed netcdf dependency.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by seanfarley (Sean Farley)
Resolution: | → worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
This is fixed in the new version of Scientific Python, so I'm marking this closed. Though, parts of Scientific Python are now broken due to numpy 1.9 :-/
Ah, nice. I'll look at this Soon™.