Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 6 years ago
#47381 new update
bsdowl-devel: new port, version 3.0.0-20150401
Reported by: | michipili (Michael Grünewald) | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | maintainer | Cc: | kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg), chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez) |
Port: | bsdowl-devel |
Description
Version 3.0.0-20150401 is a pre-release, it is usable and works well but is still not feature complete. IMO it can supersedes actual 2.2.1, but maybe we could be as careful as keeping the v2.2.1 around for a while.
Attachments (3)
Change History (19)
comment:1 Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Port: | bsdowl added |
---|---|
Version: | 2.3.3 |
comment:2 Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Keywords: | maintainer added |
---|
comment:3 Changed 10 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
Thank you for your help! I updated the Portfile
so that it now describes a bsdowl-devel
package. It conflicts with bsdowl
.
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Thanks! As an observation, your new variants do not have descriptions. Please add those.
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
I will. Is there anywhere a semi-official list of variants? I am hesitating between +gpg
and +gnupg
.
comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
I prepared a new Portfile
with variant descriptions.
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Port: | bsdowl-devel added; bsdowl removed |
---|---|
Summary: | bsdowl @2.2.1: update to 3.0.0-20150401 → bsdowl-devel: new port, version 3.0.0-20150401 |
The whitespace of the portfile does not conform to what the modeline says the whitespace is. MacPorts standard whitespace is spaces indented at multiples of 4 spaces.
Changed 10 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
Attachment: | Portfile.2 added |
---|
Changed 10 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
I prepared a new Portfile
with correct indentation. I was so happy with it that I uploaded it two times. :)
Changed 9 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
Attachment: | bsdowl.diff added |
---|
Patch to add -devel
comment:10 Changed 9 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
I think the attached patch is the correct way of doing this - however, the configure script appears to be ignoring the --without-*
comment:11 Changed 9 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
Which particular without-*
option are you talking about? Most of these flags will actually only disable or enable tests – and will not have visible effects on the installed files.
comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by kurthindenburg (Kurt Hindenburg)
These from ./configure - since the script will auto-add any of these that it finds, we have to start w/ all --without-*
--with-PACKAGE[=ARG] use PACKAGE [ARG=yes] --without-PACKAGE do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no) --with-gpg support signing of distribution files with GPG --with-gm support conversion of METAPOST pictures to PNG with GraphicsMagick --with-tex support preparation of TeX documents --with-ocaml support preparation of OCaml projects --with-findlib support use of OCaml findlib in OCaml projects --with-tidy support use of tidy to canonise HTML pages --with-opensp support static HTML pages generation with OpenSP --with-noweb support literate programming with noweb
comment:13 Changed 9 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
These with-*
force the ./configure
script to fail if the corresponding component cannot be detected. Besides this, they have no effect on what is actually installed or not.
comment:14 Changed 6 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
Is there still interest in adding this -devel
port, particularly after no activity on this ticket for over 3 years? Upstream development appears to have stalled; the latest prerelease tag is v3.0.0-20150830.
comment:15 Changed 6 years ago by chrstphrchvz (Christopher Chavez)
Cc: | chrstphrchvz added |
---|
comment:16 Changed 6 years ago by michipili (Michael Grünewald)
Thnak you for raising this @Chris. Unluckily I have currently no time to spend on the first or the second topic, so we might well close this.
Normally in cases like this, you should make this a
-devel
port, so in this case create a new port calledbsdowl-devel
. Otherwise, per the guidelines, please instead attach a unified diff of the Portfile so we can easily see what changes you are proposing.