Opened 8 years ago

Last modified 5 years ago

#51736 assigned defect

python35 @3.5.2_0 fails to build with macosx_deployment_target 10.7

Reported by: help@… Owned by: jmroot (Joshua Root)
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 2.3.4
Keywords: upstream Cc: larryv (Lawrence Velázquez), ned-deily (Ned Deily), markuskimius
Port: python34 python35 python36 python37 python38

Description

I'm running OS X 10.10.5 and Xcode 7.2.1 (latest available for Yosemite), tested also with Xcode 7.0.1. Error message is as follows (full log is attached):

:info:build DYLD_FRAMEWORK_PATH=/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_lang_python35/python35/work/Python-3.5.2 ./python.exe -E -S -m sysconfig --generate-posix-vars ;\
:info:build     if test $? -ne 0 ; then \
:info:build             echo "generate-posix-vars failed" ; \
:info:build             rm -f ./pybuilddir.txt ; \
:info:build             exit 1 ; \
:info:build     fi
:info:build /bin/sh: line 1: 25271 Killed: 9               DYLD_FRAMEWORK_PATH=/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_lang_python35/python35/work/Python-3.5.2 ./python.exe -E -S -m sysconfig --generate-posix-vars
:info:build generate-posix-vars failed
:info:build make: *** [pybuilddir.txt] Error 1

This happens only with deployment target set to 10.7, any other value (say 10.6, 10.8 or not set) works fine. It looks like some OS X security measure kicks in and kills python.exe, but running "sudo spctl --master-disable" didn't change anything. In /var/log/system.log I see the following message:

taskgated[97]: no signature for pid=25271 (cannot make code: UNIX[No such process])

All in all this looks like Xcode compiler or/and linker bug, but I would welcome any advice on this issue.

Attachments (2)

main.log (117.0 KB) - added by help@… 8 years ago.
stack_size.patch (454 bytes) - added by parafin 8 years ago.
workaround

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (10)

Changed 8 years ago by help@…

Attachment: main.log added

comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by help@…

python27 builds fine, python34 and python36 fails the same.

comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)

Cc: jwa@… removed
Owner: changed from macports-tickets@… to jwa@…
Port: python34 python36 added

Changed 8 years ago by parafin

Attachment: stack_size.patch added

workaround

comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by parafin

Looks like usage of -stack_size option when MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET is set to 10.7 triggers a bug in linker. Just removing it helps, but I'm not sure of consequences (see comments above changed line in patch file).

comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by larryv (Lawrence Velázquez)

Cc: larryv ned-deily added

We don’t support changing the deployment target globally, so I recommend that we not apply any workarounds. This should be reported upstream if it has not already been.

comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by ned-deily (Ned Deily)

Appears to be a duplicate of http://bugs.python.org/issue21381 which has languished.

comment:6 Changed 7 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Owner: changed from jyrkiwahlstedt to jmroot
Status: newassigned

comment:7 in reply to:  4 Changed 5 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)

Cc: markuskimius added
Port: python37 python38 added

Replying to larryv:

We don’t support changing the deployment target globally

I would say that we do support it, which is to say that MacPorts can do it and it is a reasonable thing for a user to try to do, however because so few users do it, there are likely to be problems encountered when using it that will need to be investigated and fixed on a port by port basis.

Has duplicate #60279 that shows it's still an issue in python38.

comment:8 Changed 5 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Keywords: upstream added

The stack size increase was added in the first place because significant amounts of real-world code was hitting the recursion limit. So removing it isn't an option. I don't know that there's anything we can do here unless someone figures out a better workaround (and that should certainly be submitted upstream as well.)

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.