Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#51845 closed submission (fixed)
New port: stlink
Reported by: | denis-fr (Denis) | Owned by: | macports-tickets@… |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | stlink |
Description
Texane stlink is an Open source version of the STMicroelectronics Stlink Tools.
https://github.com/texane/stlink
Variant +gui is not working on snow leopard (10.6). I was tested on Yosemite (10.10)
Attachments (3)
Change History (10)
Changed 8 years ago by denis-fr (Denis)
comment:1 Changed 8 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Could you use the 1.2.0 tag instead of fetching from an arbitrary commit?
Could you fetch a tarball instead of using git? (Remove fetch.type git
; add checksums.)
use_configure yes
is not needed; that's the default.
Are you sure depends_build-append port:autogen
is needed? I looked at the project's autogen.sh script, and all it does is call autoreconf, which is part of the autoconf port, which is already added as a dependency thanks to use_autoconf yes
. The autogen port is not typically needed.
comment:2 Changed 8 years ago by denis-fr (Denis)
Thanks, I modify Portfile file according your feed-backs to build 1.2.0 tag version.
comment:3 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Port: | stlink added |
---|---|
Type: | request → submission |
Version: | 2.3.4 |
comment:5 follow-up: 6 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Comments:
- Can the dependency on libusb be changed to
path:lib/libusb-1.0.dylib:libusb
to allow use of the libusb-devel? - As someone who wants to minimize variants, is it realistic for users to install this port without the GUI? Can it be switched to a subport?
Changed 8 years ago by denis-fr (Denis)
Attachment: | Portfile.3 added |
---|
dependency on path:lib/libusb-1.0.dylib:libusb
comment:6 Changed 8 years ago by denis-fr (Denis)
Replying to mf2k@…:
- Can the dependency on libusb be changed to
path:lib/libusb-1.0.dylib:libusb
to allow use of the libusb-devel?
Done.
- As someone who wants to minimize variants, is it realistic for users to install this port without the GUI? Can it be switched to a support?
Gui is not necessary. Personally, I never use it. What do you call a subport, can you give me the name of a subport?
comment:7 Changed 8 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
The variant is fine. r153829.
Portfile