#54720 closed update (fixed)
bvi @1.3.2_1: update to 1.4.0
Reported by: | l2dy (Zero King) | Owned by: | mtn88 (Max) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Port: | bvi |
Description
Attachments (4)
Change History (16)
Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
Attachment: | patch-comm.c.diff added |
---|
Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
Attachment: | patch-re.c.diff added |
---|
comment:1 follow-up: 5 Changed 7 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
Attachment: | Portfile-bvi.diff added |
---|
comment:2 follow-up: 3 Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
Port is updated to latest version. Please change ticket status to "submission" and commit the changes to the source tree. Thanks! Max
comment:3 Changed 7 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
Replying to mtn88:
Please change ticket status to "submission"
This is an "update" ticket for an existing port, "submission" is for new ports.
What are the patches for?
comment:4 follow-up: 6 Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
True, meant to write "update". Patches are for:
- Portfile-bvi.diff: Is patching the existing bvi Portfile to the latest version
- patch-re.c.diff and patch-comm.c.diff are files required for the port itself
comment:5 Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
Replying to l2dy:
Where are the patches from?
I created them. Originally submitted the port in 2002 or 2003. So here's an update ;-)
comment:6 follow-up: 7 Changed 7 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
Replying to mtn88:
- patch-re.c.diff and patch-comm.c.diff are files required for the port itself
I can build the port without these two patches (comment out patchfiles
), why are they required?
comment:7 Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
comment:8 follow-up: 9 Changed 7 years ago by kencu (Ken)
this patch patch-re.c.diff
would seem to change the way the port logic works, and might be important to look at carefully.
comment:9 Changed 7 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
Replying to kencu:
this patch
patch-re.c.diff
would seem to change the way the port logic works, and might be important to look at carefully.
Exactly what I was about to say. Value of *s_end
would change with the patch.
Edit: ++
take precedence over *
, so s_end
is effectively not used later within the if statement, but could be used elsewhere.
comment:10 Changed 7 years ago by l2dy (Zero King)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:12 Changed 7 years ago by mtn88 (Max)
Agree with removing the patches. Thanks @l2dy and @kencu for reviewing and committing!
Where are the patches from?