Opened 7 years ago
Last modified 7 years ago
#55721 accepted submission
netgen-lvs: New port
Reported by: | mguthaus (Matt Guthaus) | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.4.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | gkottar@…, petrrr | |
Port: | netgen-lvs |
Description
Hi,
I have created a new Portfile for the netgen program (http://opencircuitdesign.com/netgen/)) that is part of the Open Circuit Design tools. This is different than the math/netgen package that is already present, so I named the package science/netgen-lvs. This is a tool to accompany the science/magic and science/ngspice.
This was tested only on Sierra, not High Sierra.
Attachments (2)
Change History (4)
Changed 7 years ago by mguthaus (Matt Guthaus)
comment:1 Changed 7 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | gkottar@… petrrr added |
---|---|
Owner: | set to ryandesign |
Port: | netgen-lvs added |
Status: | new → accepted |
Summary: | New netgen LVS tool Portfile → netgen-lvs: New port |
comment:2 Changed 7 years ago by mguthaus (Matt Guthaus)
Yes, the patch has been submitted and accepted. If we update to 1.5.93, it will compile without a patch.
(For future reference, where/how do I put a patch file in the port tree?)
Here is an updated Portfile with the newer checksums, etc.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Thanks. This ticket supersedes #46495 where this port was requested.
Regarding the patchfile, I see it is hosted on a web site that appears to be your web site, and that the patch doesn't appear to be mentioned on the web site. Did you create the patch, and did you put it on your web site just to use it in this portfile? If so, it would make more sense to put the patchfile in the ports tree, in the port's files directory, like we do for most patches. If you did create the patch, have you already sent it to the developer of netgen for inclusion in the next version?