Opened 6 years ago

Closed 6 years ago

#56904 closed defect (fixed)

daq-2.0.6: checksum mismatch

Reported by: KweonKang (Kweon Kang) Owned by: roederja
Priority: Normal Milestone:
Component: ports Version: 2.5.3
Keywords: Cc:
Port: daq

Description (last modified by mf2k (Frank Schima))

I got checksum mismatch error while installing daq-2.0.6. Following is the related log. 

:notice:checksum --->  Verifying checksums for daq
:debug:checksum Executing org.macports.checksum (daq)
:info:checksum --->  Checksumming daq-2.0.6.tar.gz
:debug:checksum Calculated (rmd160) is df1f292e4f91fea5e66db54581d1952e7be3771d
:error:checksum Checksum (rmd160) mismatch for daq-2.0.6.tar.gz
:info:checksum Portfile checksum: daq-2.0.6.tar.gz rmd160 cf3a9df96829f63324a44dae5f2248d835e6ac4d
:info:checksum Distfile checksum: daq-2.0.6.tar.gz rmd160 df1f292e4f91fea5e66db54581d1952e7be3771d
:debug:checksum Calculated (sha256) is d41da5f7793e66044e6927dd868c0525e7ee4ec1a3515bf74ef9a30cd9273af0
:error:checksum Checksum (sha256) mismatch for daq-2.0.6.tar.gz
:info:checksum Portfile checksum: daq-2.0.6.tar.gz sha256 b40e1d1273e08aaeaa86e69d4f28d535b7e53bdb3898adf539266b63137be7cb
:info:checksum Distfile checksum: daq-2.0.6.tar.gz sha256 d41da5f7793e66044e6927dd868c0525e7ee4ec1a3515bf74ef9a30cd9273af0
:info:checksum The correct checksum line may be:
:info:checksum checksums           rmd160  df1f292e4f91fea5e66db54581d1952e7be3771d \
:info:checksum                     sha256  d41da5f7793e66044e6927dd868c0525e7ee4ec1a3515bf74ef9a30cd9273af0 \
:info:checksum                     size    518013

Change History (5)

comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by KweonKang (Kweon Kang)

Description: modified (diff)

comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)

Owner: set to roederja
Status: new → assigned

In the future, please use WikiFormatting and add the port maintainer(s) to Cc (port info --maintainers daq), if any.

comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)

Description: modified (diff)

comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)

Stealth update: The gzip file appears to have been regenerated with a different compression level. The decompressed tar file is identical.

comment:5 Changed 6 years ago by roederja

Resolution: → fixed
Status: assigned → closed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.