#59643 closed enhancement (fixed)
Please add port version, revision and variant info the debug output
Reported by: | lemzwerg (Werner Lemberg) | Owned by: | jmroot (Joshua Root) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | MacPorts 2.7.0 |
Component: | base | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | |
Port: |
Description (last modified by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt))
I've noticed that in main.log
files there is no information what version and variants have been requested – for example,
ImageMagick @6.9.9-40_7+x11
I suggest to make port
add this information at the very top of main.log
. This would also help identify various main.log
files more easily.
Change History (6)
comment:1 follow-up: 3 Changed 5 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Type: | request → enhancement |
---|
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | Please add package version and variant info to `make.log` → Please add port version, revision and variant info the debug output |
Replying to jmroot:
This information can be found in the name of the archive that is fetched,
Not if MacPorts doesn't attempt to fetch archives, for example on the buildbot where having this information in the logs would have been really helpful. Variant information is in the log in an obscure format (the lines reading DEBUG: Executing variant foo provides foo
) but having it in the standard name @version_revision +variants
format would be more natural and besides would take up fewer lines in the log, and reducing the number of silly things we log would be fantastic.
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Cc: | ryandesign added |
---|
comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Owner: | set to jmroot |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Milestone: | → MacPorts 2.7.0 |
---|
This information can be found in the name of the archive that is fetched, but sure, why not.