Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#59778 closed defect (fixed)
asciidoc: make distributable
Reported by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) | Owned by: | neverpanic (Clemens Lang) |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | ports | Version: | 2.6.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | jmroot (Joshua Root) | |
Port: | asciidoc |
Description
"asciidoc" is not distributable because its license "gpl" conflicts with license "OpenSSL" of dependency "openssl"
Can this be changed?
asciidoc is noarch, so it doesn't link to openssl's (or any other port's) libraries, so I don't think the license conflict is applicable here. asciidoc merely is a python script, so it depends on a python port, which links with openssl libraries.
I don't know where the proper place is to fix this. Do we mark asciidoc as license_noconflict openssl
, or do we mark the python* ports as such?
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
comment:2 follow-up: 3 Changed 5 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
Ah. I don't know.
What got me to this point was the fact that ccache is not distributable because it depends on asciidoc, and I want to fix that. Would it at least be appropriate to add installs_libs no
to the asciidoc port to fix that?
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by jmroot (Joshua Root)
Replying to ryandesign:
Would it at least be appropriate to add
installs_libs no
to the asciidoc port to fix that?
Yes, it looks like that might be OK.
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by neverpanic (Clemens Lang)
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Does it make no use, directly or indirectly, of the hashlib or ssl modules? The program being a python script doesn't change the GPL's requirements.