Opened 5 years ago
Last modified 2 years ago
#60102 assigned defect
kerberos5 @1.18 fails to build with libressl-devel 2.9.2.
| Reported by: | hakoyamah | Owned by: | ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | ports | Version: | 2.6.2 |
| Keywords: | haspatch | Cc: | bK4gYuRo |
| Port: | kerberos5 |
Description
After kerberos5 updated to 1.18, it could not build with libressl-devel 2.9.2.
workaround:
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by reneeotten (Renee Otten)
| Owner: | set to ryandesign |
|---|---|
| Priority: | High → Normal |
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by mf2k (Frank Schima)
| Keywords: | libressl removed |
|---|
comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
| Keywords: | haspatch added |
|---|---|
| Summary: | kerberos5 1.18 fails to build with libressl-devel 2.9.2. → kerberos5 @1.18 fails to build with libressl-devel 2.9.2. |
comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by hakoyamah
We aren't the developers of kerberos and we don't want to become kerberos developers or maintain patches like this forever; changes like this need to be vetted by the developers of kerberos before being included in MacPorts.
OK. Please close this ticket.
comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by bK4gYuRo
| Cc: | bK4gYuRo added |
|---|
comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by ryandesign (Ryan Carsten Schmidt)
We should not close the ticket until the problem has been solved.
comment:7 Changed 2 years ago by jerryyhom
The problem was probably solved by commit c6d702d. In any case, kerberos5 and libressl compatibility is available with a current patch. This ticket may be closed.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Did you get this patch from the developers of kerberos or did you get it somewhere else? Or did you make it yourself?
If you made it or got it from somewhere else, can you report it to the developers of kerberos, please?
We aren't the developers of kerberos and we don't want to become kerberos developers or maintain patches like this forever; changes like this need to be vetted by the developers of kerberos before being included in MacPorts.